Intel’s New Xeon W-3300 Workstation CPUs Get Decimated By AMD’s Threadripper Professional, 32 Core Threadripper Beats 38 Core Xeon

Intel’s newly launched Xeon W-3300 Workstation CPUs aren’t off to an ideal begin as preliminary opinions present them being destroyed by AMD’s Threadripper Professional lineup. The evaluation revealed by options supplier, Puget Systems, showcases how Intel’s flagship Xeon W-3300 CPU is getting decimated by AMD’s Threadripper Professional with fewer cores.

Intel Unable To Take Again Workstation CPU Throne From AMD, Xeon W-3300 Will get Decimated By Threadripper Professional

In our official launch publish, we talked about how Intel’s total high-end Xeon W-3300 choices have been competing in opposition to a single AMD Threadripper Professional half, the 3975WX by way of options & pricing. It seems to be like even by way of efficiency, the Threadripper Professional lineup has an enormous benefit that Intel can not rival regardless of an enormous 18% IPC uplift over the earlier era.

AMD Blasts By way of $100/Share Throughout Buying and selling To All Time File Excessive Worth!

Whereas there are a number of cases the place the brand new Intel Xeon W-3300 processors both match or beat the AMD Threadripper Professional CPUs, they typically required us to set Home windows to make use of the “Excessive Efficiency” energy profile. And even then, AMD by and enormous got here out on prime in our testing.

via Puget Systems

In benchmarks revealed by Puget Methods, you’ll be able to see the AMD Threadripper 3975WX 32 Core CPU providing higher efficiency than Intel’s Xeon W-3375 38 Core CPU in a number of benchmarks. It can be seen that even the 16 core Threadripper Professional 3955WX additionally comes out as an extremely aggressive chip in opposition to Intel’s 32 core and 24 core Xeon W-3300 fashions.

Xeon W-3300 vs AMD Threadripper Professional Workstation CPU Benchmarks (Balanced Mode):

The flagship AMD Threadripper Professional 3995WX flexes its muscle mass in Unreal Engine, Cinebench R23, and V-Ray benchmarks that are designed to make use of upper core counts. It’s attention-grabbing to see that Intel’s flagship 38 core chip, the Xeon W-3375 solely matches the 32 core Threadripper Professional in Cinebench R23 and V-Ray benchmarks whereas getting handily outperformed in Unreal Engine.

Puget Methods clarifies that Intel’s Xeon W-3300 CPUs presently have a difficulty the place they carry out undesirably within the Home windows Balanced Mode profile. Setting the chips to high-performance mode results in a lot better efficiency the place the Intel chips do come nearer to the AMD Threadripper Professional elements however even nonetheless, you need to bear in mind the upper energy and temperatures on Intel chips.

Xeon W-3300 vs AMD Threadripper Professional Workstation CPU Benchmarks (Excessive-Perf Mode):

Intel Launches Xeon W-3300 Ice Lake Workstation CPUs: Up To 38 Cores, 4.0 GHz Clocks, 270W TDP, Beginning at $949 US

Intel Xeon W-3300 vs AMD Threadripper Professional

The one exception is the compute efficiency benchmark (HPL Linpack) the place Intel provides an enormous beating to AMD Threadripper Professional however that is largely as a result of benchmark favoring Intel’s CPUs & OneAPI software program suite. So it isn’t a pure apples-to-apples comparability.

Earlier this week, Puget Methods reported that AMD had led by way of general workstation CPU gross sales in comparison with Intel. This was the primary time in over a decade that Intel had misplaced its workstation phase result in AMD and that is primarily as a result of implausible set of options, efficiency, and the general worth that AMD presents with its Threadripper & Threadripper Professional class processors. With the newest benchmarks in, it seems to be like AMD workstation CPU gross sales are going to maintain driving up till Intel can deliver out a product that truly tries to compete with AMD’s lineup.