The primary unofficial efficiency metric of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 Non-XT graphics card has leaked out throughout the 3DMark Time Spy benchmark.
AMD Radeon RX 6600 Non-XT Graphics Card Efficiency Benchmark in 3DMark Time Spy Leaked, Slower Than The NVIDIA RTX 3060
The AMD Radeon RX 6600 Non-XT launches subsequent week and because the press drivers have been shipped out, we’re certain to see some unofficial leaks. We’ve got already seen the official GPU efficiency benchmarks for the cardboard however these are the best-case state of affairs as impartial PC checks would paint a barely extra practical image.
AMD Radeon RX 6600 Non-XT 3DMark Time Spy benchmark has leaked out. (Picture Credit: HXL)
Relating to efficiency, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 benchmark leaked inside 3DMark Time Spy by HXL reveals a graphics rating of 8155 factors. The general rating is 8612 factors with the setup consisting of an AMD Ryzen 9 5950X CPU. Evaluating the rating to our personal benchmark of the RX 6600 XT, we see that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 is not less than 6.6% quicker in the identical benchmark. The cardboard is round 8.5% quicker than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and there are rumors of a 12 GB variant being prepped to deal with entry-level RDNA 2 playing cards such because the RX 6600 Non-XT.
If NVIDIA may provide an honest specs replace to the unique RTX 2060, the upper VRAM and pricing of round $300 US would possibly make it fairly a beautiful mainstream possibility. It will be actually fascinating to see a two-year-old Turing card providing a aggressive place in opposition to a model new RDNA 2 providing from AMD. Now AMD may have a lead in total energy effectivity however total, NVIDIA’s Turing shall be providing virtually comparable efficiency with greater VRAM and likewise probably a cheaper price.
AMD RX 6600 Graphics Card Specs
The AMD Radeon RX 6600 graphics card is anticipated to function the Navi 23 XL GPU which goes to function 28 Compute Items or 1792 stream processors. The cardboard may even rock 32 MB Infinity Cache & will function as much as 8 GB GDDR6 reminiscence capability working throughout a 128-bit broad bus interface. The core clocks shall be maintained at 2044 MHz recreation and 2491 MHz increase which ought to yield round 9 TFLOPs of compute efficiency.
The pin speeds shall be saved at 16 Gbps which is able to convey the overall bandwidth to 256 GB/s. As per the rumor mill, the graphics card is anticipated to function 30 MH/s within the Ethereum mining, and by way of artificial efficiency, the cardboard scores 7805 factors within the 3DMark Time Spy graphics check. AMD’s Radeon RX 6600 Non-XT may even rock a 132W TDP which is a 28W discount from the XT variant. So we’re taking a look at a 15% discount in base clock with a 21% discount in energy. We’ve got additionally seen customized fashions leak out some time again that you could see over right here.
AMD Radeon RX 6600 collection shall be positioned as a premium 1080p gaming resolution. The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT launched at a pricing of $379 US so we are able to count on a value of round $299-$329 US for the non-XT variant. This places its proper subsequent to the GeForce RTX 3060 which has an MSRP of $329 US however primarily based on the prevailing market scenario, we should not count on the cardboard to be priced at that vary however somewhat a lot greater.
AMD Radeon RX 6000 Collection “RDNA 2” Graphics Card Lineup:
| Graphics Card | AMD Radeon RX 6600 | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6700 | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT Liquid Cooled | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU | Navi 23 (XL?) | Navi 23 (XT) | Navi 22 (XL?) | Navi 22 (XT?) | Navi 21 XL | Navi 21 XT | Navi 21 XTX | Navi 21 XTXH | Navi 21 XTXH |
| Course of Node | 7nm | 7nm | 7nm | 7nm | 7nm | 7nm | 7nm | 7nm | 7nm |
| Die Measurement | 237mm2 | 237mm2 | 336mm2 | 336mm2 | 520mm2 | 520mm2 | 520mm2 | 520mm2 | 520mm2 |
| Transistors | 11.06 Billion | 11.06 Billion | 17.2 Billion | 17.2 Billion | 26.8 Billion | 26.8 Billion | 26.8 Billion | 26.8 Billion | 26.8 Billion |
| Compute Items | 28 | 32 | 36 | 40 | 60 | 72 | 80 | 80 | 80 |
| Stream Processors | 1792 | 2048 | 2304 | 2560 | 3840 | 4608 | 5120 | 5120 | 5120 |
| TMUs/ROPs | TBA | 128/64 | TBA | 160/64 | 240 / 96 | 288 / 128 | 320 / 128 | 320 / 128 | 320 / 128 |
| Sport Clock | 2044 MHz | 2359 MHz | TBA | 2424 MHz | 1815 MHz | 2015 MHz | 2015 MHz | 2250 MHz | TBA |
| Increase Clock | 2491 MHz | 2589 MHz | TBA | 2581 MHz | 2105 MHz | 2250 MHz | 2250 MHz | 2345 MHz | 2435 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPs | 9.0 TFLOPs | 10.6 TFLOPs | TBA | 13.21 TFLOPs | 16.17 TFLOPs | 20.74 TFLOPs | 23.04 TFLOPs | 24.01 TFLOPs | 24.93 TFLOPs |
| Reminiscence Measurement | 8 GB GDDR6 + 32 MB Infinity Cache? | 8 GB GDDR6 + 32 MB Infinity Cache | 12 GB GDDR6 + 96 MB Infinity Cache? | 12 GB GDDR6 + 96 MB Infinity Cache | 16 GB GDDR6 +128 MB Infinity Cache | 16 GB GDDR6 +128 MB Infinity Cache | 16 GB GDDR6 +128 MB Infinity Cache | 16 GB GDDR6 +128 MB Infinity Cache | 16 GB GDDR6 +128 MB Infinity Cache |
| Reminiscence Bus | 128-bit | 128-bit | 192-bit | 192-bit | 256-bit | 256-bit | 256-bit | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| Reminiscence Clock | 16 Gbps | 16 Gbps | 16 Gbps? | 16 Gbps | 16 Gbps | 16 Gbps | 16 Gbps | 18 Gbps | 18 Gbps |
| Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 256 GB/s | 384 GB/s | 384 GB/s | 512 GB/s | 512 GB/s | 512 GB/s | 576 GB/s | 576 GB/s |
| TDP | 132W | 160W | TBA | 230W | 250W | 300W | 300W | 330W | 330W |
| Worth | $299-$329 ? | $379 US | TBA | $479 US | $579 US | $649 US | $999 US | ~$1199 US | ~$1199 US |
